|Business News Links|
Business Moves with Building Sale
|Twin Facades of Corporate Assistance|
|Craft Beer Keeps Brewing in CT|
|Builders Say Too Many Regs|
|Pro Business Efforts in Legisalture|
Rep Jason Rojas, D-East Hartford: Taxing non-profits are an option.
Finance panel eyes ending sales tax exemption for nonprofits
By: Keith M Phaneuf ctmirror.com
Hartford: The Connecticut legislature’s tax-writing panel is considering a measure that would repeal the sales tax exemption on goods and services sold to nonprofits — a provision that saves these entities more than $200 million per year.
Democratic leaders of the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee said this proposal, which will go to a public hearing next week, is part of an ongoing exploration of possible widening of Connecticut’s sales tax base.
But the top House Republican on the committee and the state’s largest nonprofit association cautioned it could harm the nonprofit community at a time when Connecticut relies on it the most.
“At this point we are just hearing it,” Rep. Jason Rojas, D-East Hartford, House chair of the Finance committee said. “I think we have to take all (revenue) options seriously.”
The General Assembly and Gov. Dannel P. Malloy are trying to close major projected deficits in the next two-year state budget — a problem driven in part by surging retirement benefit costs tied to more than seven decades of inadequate funding.
State finances, unless adjusted, will run $1.4 billion in deficit next fiscal year, and $1.6 billion in the red in 2018-19, according to the legislature’s nonpartisan Office of Fiscal Analysis.
The Malloy administration pegs the shortfall at slightly more, forecasting potential deficits of $1.7 billion next fiscal year and $1.9 billion the year after that.
According to nonpartisan analysts, the sales tax exemption saves nonprofits about $216.2 million per year. Analysts also project that if the exemption were repealed, the state would see an annual revenue gain of $203.3 million.
Both Rojas and Sen. John Fonfara of Hartford — the Senate Democratic chair — said that while the tax panel’s deadline for approving bills is April 28, no consensus on whether to repeal the exemption for nonprofits has been established.
“We have not tested it or vote-counted it or anything like that,” Rojas said.
The two Democratic leaders said early in the 2017 legislative session that they would explore options to bolster sales tax receipts, including both broadening the base and increasing the 6.35 percent tax rate to help close the projected budget deficit.
The sales tax has been the second-largest source of revenue for the budget since 1991, when it relinquished its status as the top revenue engine to the new state income tax.
Though less volatile than the income levy, the sales tax is expected to face a slight hit in the next few fiscal years as Connecticut’s economic recovery lags the nation’s.
Sales tax receipts, which are expected to total nearly $4.25 billion this fiscal year, are projected to drop to about $3.9 billion next fiscal year and rebound partially to $4 billion by 2018-19, according to analysts for the legislature and for the Malloy administration.
Fonfara and Rojas both said a sales tax increase would be less harmful to the economy than boosting state income tax rates.
Malloy has said on several occasions that efforts to close the projected deficits in the next two-year budget should rely more on spending cuts than tax increases.
But one of the governor’s revenue proposals — requiring communities to pay one-third of the annual contribution to the teachers’ pension fund — has garnered significant criticism from lawmakers of both parties.
Some Democratic legislators have said these pension bills, which would total $408 million next fiscal year and $421 million in 2018-19, could be reduced or eliminated if sales tax receipts are increased.
Rep. Chris Davis of Ellington, ranking GOP representative on the finance committee, argued such an increase might be counter-productive, noting that as state government continues to scale back social service programs to close budget deficits, it increases its reliance on community-based nonprofit social services.
“To add an additional tax burden onto these groups, that are doing the bulk of the (social services) work in our communities, might be the wrong direction,” Davis said.
The executive director of the CT Community Nonprofit Alliance expressed similar concerns.
“After a decade of budget cuts with more pending, Connecticut’s nonprofits are alarmed that lawmakers are considering a sales tax change that in the first year alone would take $200 million away from services provided by organizations like homeless shelters and food pantries,” Executive Director Gian-Carl Casa said. “Nonprofits have long been exempted from sales tax here and across the country for good reason: They provide services in their communities that government cannot. Eliminating that exemption would divert funds from programs for individuals with developmental disabilities, people struggling with substance abuse, victims of domestic violence, and arts and cultural programs, to name just a few.”
Two advocacy groups pitched sales tax increases to legislators earlier this year.
The Connecticut Conference of Municipalities proposed raising the rate to 7 percent and broadening the range of goods and services subject to the tax to raise about $700 million annually.
And Connecticut Voices for Children, a New Haven-based progressive policy group included a sales tax hike on a list of revenue-raising options to protect health care, education and social services.
Connecticut Voices estimated $1.5 billion extra could be raised annually by applying the tax to a much broader range of items. Lawmakers also could expand the base and reduce the sales tax rate from 6.35 percent to 5.5 percent and still boost sales tax receipts by $730 million per year, the group said.
Labor Study: Businesses can pay more to preserve CT’s quality of life
HARTFORD: Connecticut businesses can afford — and should pay — higher taxes to support investments in education, health care and other priorities to grow the economy and preserve quality of life, a report sponsored by the state’s biggest labor group urged Wednesday.
The analysis prepared for the state AFL-CIO by the Center for Public Policy and Social Research — a policy think-tank at Central Connecticut State University in New Britain — also concluded Connecticut businesses enjoy some of the best economic advantages in the nation.
But the state’s chief business lobby countered that Connecticut lost jobs in 2016 while they grew in most of the rest of the nation, and this dangerous trend cannot be reversed if taxes are not stabilized.
Fox Farm Brwery in Salem, May Be Joined By Many Others If Legislation Passes Senate
Rep. Caroline Simmons takes a picture of the vote tally after passage of her first bill as co-chair of the Commerce Committee.
The House of Representatives began moving legislation Wednesday with the passage of a string of bipartisan bills, including measures authorizing farm-based breweries and expanding an “angel investor” tax credit program.
With nine weeks left until the constitutional adjournment deadline of midnight June 7, the House calendar is filling with debate-ready bills as all but three committees have passed their deadlines for reporting legislation to the floor.
The House voted unanimously Wednesday for a bill authorizing farmers to bottle and sell up to 50,000 gallons of beer that they brew on their farms annually, an expansion of the growing craft brewing industry.
Jepsen sees ‘not insubstantial’ risk in casino expansion
HARTFORD: Allowing Connecticut’s two federally recognized tribes to jointly operate a casino off tribal lands would pose legal risks that “are not insubstantial” to the more than $250 million in slots revenue annually shared with the state, Attorney General George Jepsen wrote Monday in a formal legal opinion sought by Gov. Dannel P. Malloy.
Jepsen’s new eight-page analysis is unlikely to reassure lawmakers who backed away from casino expansion in 2015 after the attorney general’s office first flagged the risks and complications of allowing the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan tribal nations to develop the state’s first commercial casino without an open-bid process, which already has generated a lawsuit from their competitor, MGM Resorts International.
HARTFORD: The Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan Tribe[s], released a rendering of their planned East Windsor entertainment and gaming facility. The two tribes also highlighted the benefits of Senate Bill 957 authorizing the casino and which would include an infusion of funding to assist the state's tourism industry.
According to the tribes the proposed development will be a “world-class,” 200,000 square foot gaming and entertainment facility with 2,000 slot machines and 50 to 150 table games. The Senate bill requires the facility to pay a 25% tax on its slot machines and a 25% tax on its table games.
By Mitchell Young
WASHINGTON: Aetna [NYSE: AET] and Cigna [NYSE:CI] have watched their huge mergers collapse this month under the weight of lawsuits brought by the Obama administration.
The Justice Department won a first round legal ruling against the Anthem [NYSE: ANTM] Cigna deal and Cigna said enough is enough. Anthem said no way, and now the would be couple are talking trash and in court.
Cigna CEO David Cordani was among the health insurance executives that met with the President. Cigna and Anthem are suing the hell out of each other, over their busted deal, both sides are claiming the other guy wanted to scuttle the merger. Some recent reports say that with a new administration, Cigna, Anthem's merger could be resurrected.
New Haven Magazine